Contact

Reaching the right resource matters — especially when a rules question is sitting in the middle of a session and the table is waiting. This page covers the contact options available for DnD Authority, the geographic scope of the community served, and exactly what to include in a message to get a useful response without back-and-forth delays.

Additional contact options

The primary contact form on this page handles general inquiries, but depending on the nature of the question, other channels may be faster.

For rules clarifications and lore questions, the site's reference library covers a wide range of topics — from ability scores and modifiers to concentration spell rules — and the search function will surface an answer faster than waiting on a response to any message. The D&D Frequently Asked Questions page handles the questions that arrive on a near-daily basis.

For feedback about published content — an error spotted, a clarification that would improve a page, a missing topic — the contact form is exactly the right tool. That kind of feedback has a real effect: errors get corrected, gaps get filled, and the reference library becomes more useful for the next person who shows up with the same question.

Social channels are linked in the site footer for announcements and updates. Those channels are not monitored for support requests; messages sent there are not routed to the editorial team.

How to reach this office

The contact form on this page is the single fastest path to a response. Messages submitted through the form are reviewed on business days. Response times vary based on volume, but content-related inquiries — factual corrections, clarification requests, missing topic suggestions — are treated as priority items because they directly affect the accuracy of what gets published.

A few practical notes on the form itself:

1. Select the correct inquiry type. The dropdown distinguishes between content feedback, partnership inquiries, and general questions. Choosing the right category routes the message correctly and avoids delay.
2. Be specific about the page or topic. "The spellcasting section has an error" requires follow-up. "The spell slots and spellcasting page lists the wrong number of 3rd-level slots for a Level 5 Wizard" gets acted on immediately.
3. Include a source if disputing a rules claim. The Player's Handbook chapter and page number, or a direct reference to official errata published by Wizards of the Coast, makes verification straightforward.

Email contact is available for formal partnership or licensing inquiries and is verified in the site footer. That channel is not intended for rules questions or content corrections — the form handles both more efficiently.

Service area covered

DnD Authority operates as a national reference resource for players and Dungeon Masters across the United States, covering all 50 states. The content is written for the 5th Edition ruleset as the dominant current edition — though the D&D editions history page provides context for players coming from earlier systems like 3.5e or 4e.

The reference library addresses the full spectrum of play: in-person and online games, published adventure modules alongside homebrew content, and beginner resources like the Starter Set and Essentials Kit alongside more technical topics like encounter design and balancing.

There is no geographic restriction on who can use the site or submit a message through the contact form — the national scope label reflects the primary audience, not a limitation on access.

What to include in your message

A well-constructed message gets a faster, more useful response. The difference between a message that requires 3 follow-ups and one that resolves in a single exchange usually comes down to 4 elements:

1. The specific page or topic. Include the URL or the page title from the navigation. "The combat rules page" is workable; the direct slug /combat-rules-overview is better.
2. The specific claim or section. Point to the paragraph, the table, or the heading. If a numbered list has 6 items and item 4 appears incorrect, say so explicitly.
3. The basis for the concern. For rules questions, cite the official source: the Player's Handbook, the Dungeon Master's Guide, the Monster Manual, or errata documents published by Wizards of the Coast. For factual topics, a named public source is helpful.
4. The desired outcome. A correction request is different from a content suggestion, which is different from a partnership inquiry. Stating the goal directly saves a round of clarification.

Messages that arrive with all 4 elements — page, section, source, and desired outcome — are the ones that get resolved the same day. Messages that arrive as "something seems wrong on your site" tend to age in the queue while the editorial team figures out what that something is.

The contact form accepts messages up to 2,000 characters. For longer submissions — detailed homebrew feedback, extended lore discussions, or multi-page correction sets — a brief summary in the form with a document attached works well.